Who said the back end of a bus was ..... well, not too attractive?
I've risen to the challenge offered by Bristols, but as you will see I draw no final conclusions on whether or not back sides are attractive.
Judge for yourself. But I'm not worried whether you eventually draw any conclusions.
Have fun!
And if your tastes are more cosmopolitan, why not got to http://mudlark.fotopic.net/ where you can see all shapes and sizes to suit the widest range of interests?
;&}}} |
|
Alexander body on a Bristol LH - Alexander Midland MLH 4 640x425 117.005_144.jpg 0000-00-00 00:00:00 |
Bristol VRT comparisons - a former West Midlands Mark II (4434: TOE 434N, as South Wales 858), and ECW-bodied SWT example, 955 (WTH 955T) 497x480 026.731Cc_480.jpg 1999-11-30 00:00:00 |
Duple Commander IV on Bristol RELH - Hants & Dorset 640x425 053.230_119.jpg 0000-00-00 00:00:00 |
East Lancs backend on a Bristol RESL - Widnes 7 (RTF 307M) with Devaway in Chester 640x417 052.3015C_738.jpg 1999-11-30 00:00:00 |
Eastern Coachwork derivations. The Bristol RESL on the right clearly shows that, despite its three bay rear (to include the mergency exit) the body shape has been derived from the Bristol MW on the left. 640x421 102.435c_237.jpg 1999-11-30 00:00:00 |
North Western 163 (AJA 163) 370x480 008.096_106.jpg 1999-11-30 00:00:00 |
P343 ROO, showing traces of its former two-door configuration ahead of the rear acle 640x480 032.1293J.JPG 2007-07-23 13:23:00 |
Seddon: Seddon bodied a handful of Bristol RELL6Gs with 34-seat, two-door bodies for Reading. This is 272 (NDP 272G) 640x470 052.216var_118.jpg 0000-00-00 00:00:00 |
| | |